TRiCBIO
ApplicationsNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOProject inquiry中文

Application

ADC efficacy & tissue distribution

Compare ADC candidates in human organoids using target-expression, tissue-distribution and activity readouts, with dedicated studies of bystander killing.

Study focus

What this study can help you decide

  1. 01How do target level and spatial pattern support candidate comparison?
  2. 02How do tissue distribution and killing relate?
  3. 03When are penetration, bystander or immune endpoints valuable?

Study workflow

How the study moves from question to results

01

Target and tissue context

Use histology, IHC or IF to assess target expression and spatial heterogeneity, and confirm model identity and culture quality.

02

Labeling and spatial imaging

Define labeling, incubation, imaging and competition or target-negative controls around molecule properties; add dedicated imaging and quantification when intact-organoid penetration is a priority.

03

Killing and mechanism endpoints

Interpret spatial distribution with dose response, viability, apoptosis and histology.

04

ADC ranking

Compare candidates consistently and deliver original images, quantitative analysis and interpretation.

Model options

Match the model to indication, mechanism and sample

Study design options

ADC studies first compare candidates through section imaging and functional readouts; quantitative penetration studies can then add serial sections or z-stacks, distance/intensity profiles, time points and target/competition controls.

PROJECT DISCUSSION

Plan an ADC organoid study

ADC design and target biology determine the tumor models, distribution imaging, killing and bystander endpoints for the study.