TRiCBIO
Models & ProductsNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOProject inquiry中文
Model & study servicesTumor PDO

HCC PDO / PDO 2.0

Use conventional PDOs for HCC efficacy studies. Immunotherapy or anti-angiogenic programs can add PDO 2.0, vascular-marker profiling or a purpose-built co-culture.

AlbuminCK19CD8NKTAM
Model source

Patient HCC tissue

Culture / format

PDO · ALI · Immune co-culture study format

Supporting evidence

TRiCBIO HCC PDO study data

Study planning

From study objective to model and assay plan

Tumor type, sample condition, candidate and intended comparison guide the culture format, controls and assays.

01

Tumor sample context

Tumor type, collection site, sample condition, expected timing and available ethics documentation.

02

Candidate and study objective

Modality, dosing plan, controls and the response or comparison the study should address.

03

Assays and deliverables

Planned histology, flow, molecular or functional assays, together with preferred data and report formats.

Study design

Interpret HCC drug response from tissue and model identity

HCC PDO studies combine source tissue, model identity, immune or vascular context and treatment response, connecting activity readouts with tissue biology to explain differences among candidates.

01

Confirm source and pathology

Review the documented liver-tumor pathology, sampling site, prior treatment and available pathology.

02

Compare tissue and model

Use H&E and hepatic, epithelial or endothelial markers to confirm that the model is ready for efficacy work.

03

Design treatment around mechanism

Set doses, time points and controls around small-molecule, ICB, anti-angiogenic or combination mechanisms.

04

Interpret response in context

Compare candidates using viability, histology, immune composition, cytokine or flow results in context.

Study scope

Review sample requirements, assays and deliverables

01

Study applications

  • Small-molecule and targeted efficacy
  • ICB and immune combinations
  • Anti-angiogenic and mechanism studies
02

Model and assays

  • PDO 1.0 or PDO 2.0 study selection
  • H&E, IHC, IF and flow
  • Viability, cytokines and program endpoints
03

Study value

  • Candidate and combination comparison
  • Tissue- or immune-associated interpretation
  • Priorities for the next study

Research applications

Recommended applications

  • Candidates and combinations
  • ICB and anti-angiogenic mechanism studies
  • Tumor, immune and vascular-marker profiling

Assays & QC

Tumor identity, efficacy and immune readouts

Key markers

AlbuminCK19CD8NKTAM

Available assays

  • H&E / IF
  • Flow cytometry
  • Viability
  • Cytokines

QC approach

Hepatic identity and tissue architecture establish the model baseline, followed by immune, vascular-marker and functional readouts matched to the selected system.

Study & delivery

Model characterization, treatment data and reporting

Choose a supplied model or a TRiCBIO-run efficacy and mechanism study. Typical deliverables include imaging, assay data, analysis and a study report.

Related solutions

Related study options

PROJECT DISCUSSION

Discuss a HCC PDO / PDO 2.0 study

Tumor type, sample status, candidate profile and comparison endpoints determine the culture format, controls, assay panel and deliverables for the HCC PDO / PDO 2.0.