TRiCBIO
Models & ProductsNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOProject inquiry中文
Model & study servicesTumor PDO

Colorectal cancer PDO

Established from primary or metastatic colorectal tumors to compare drug response, tissue features and inter-sample differences.

Epithelial identityH&EDrug response
Model source

Primary or metastatic colorectal cancer tissue, with sample condition and modeling strategy integrated into study design

Culture / format

PDO

Supporting evidence

TRiCBIO colorectal cancer PDO histology and drug-response study data

Study planning

From study objective to model and assay plan

Tumor type, sample condition, candidate and intended comparison guide the culture format, controls and assays.

01

Tumor sample context

Tumor type, collection site, sample condition, expected timing and available ethics documentation.

02

Candidate and study objective

Modality, dosing plan, controls and the response or comparison the study should address.

03

Assays and deliverables

Planned histology, flow, molecular or functional assays, together with preferred data and report formats.

Study design

Use colorectal PDO comparisons to prioritize candidates

Primary or metastatic site, prior treatment and sample state can all affect the model. Define whether the study ranks candidates, compares combinations or explores inter-sample response differences.

01

Confirm samples and groups

Review primary or metastatic origin, pathology, prior therapy and sample count, then use consistent analysis criteria to separate source variation from treatment effects.

02

Confirm model identity and study QC

Use morphology, H&E, epithelial identity and study-relevant immune profiling to select models for a consistent comparison.

03

Standardize treatment and readouts

Run single-agent or combination studies with consistent dose, timing, controls and analysis, retaining the needed histologic and mechanistic endpoints.

04

Separate treatment from sample variation

Integrate model QC, response curves and tissue or immune findings to distinguish treatment effects from sample variation, prioritize candidate strategies and define follow-on mechanism studies.

Study scope

Review sample requirements, assays and deliverables

01

Study applications

  • Candidate and combination ranking
  • Primary-versus-metastatic exploration
  • Target, immune or tissue-phenotype association
02

Readout set

  • Viability and dose response
  • H&E, IHC and immunofluorescence
  • Flow, cytokines and program-specific endpoints
03

Study value

  • Narrow candidate options
  • Identify differences worth follow-up
  • Inform the next experimental stage

Research applications

Recommended applications

  • Candidate and combination studies
  • Histology and epithelial profiling
  • Inter-sample drug-response differences

Assays & QC

Tumor identity, efficacy and immune readouts

Key markers

Epithelial identityH&EDrug response

Available assays

  • H&E
  • IHC / IF
  • Viability
  • Drug response

QC approach

Tissue architecture and epithelial identity establish the baseline for drug-response studies; immune-focused programs can add PDO 2.0 / ALI.

Study & delivery

Model characterization, treatment data and reporting

Choose a supplied model or a TRiCBIO-run efficacy study. Typical deliverables include histology, viability data and a project report.

Related solutions

Related study options

PROJECT DISCUSSION

Discuss a colorectal cancer PDO study

Tumor type, sample status, candidate profile and comparison endpoints determine the culture format, controls, assay panel and deliverables for the colorectal cancer PDO.