TRiCBIO
Models & ProductsNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOProject inquiry中文
Model & study servicesTumor PDO

Pancreatic cancer PDO

Use conventional PDOs for pancreatic epithelial and drug-response studies, with ALI or custom co-culture added when stromal or immune context is important.

CK19CD3CD8CD107a
Model source

Patient pancreatic cancer tissue

Culture / format

PDO · ALI/custom co-culture

Supporting evidence

TRiCBIO pancreatic cancer PDO culture and study data

Study planning

From study objective to model and assay plan

Tumor type, sample condition, candidate and intended comparison guide the culture format, controls and assays.

01

Tumor sample context

Tumor type, collection site, sample condition, expected timing and available ethics documentation.

02

Candidate and study objective

Modality, dosing plan, controls and the response or comparison the study should address.

03

Assays and deliverables

Planned histology, flow, molecular or functional assays, together with preferred data and report formats.

Study design

Integrate epithelial identity, tissue barriers and microenvironment to compare candidate therapies in PDAC PDOs

PDAC is dense and sample-variable. Confirm tumor epithelial identity and culture quality, then configure penetration, bystander or immune endpoints around the candidate mechanism.

01

Confirm source and epithelial identity

Review primary or metastatic site, pathology and sample state, then confirm the model with morphology and epithelial markers such as CK19.

02

Select the required complexity

Use conventional PDO for tumor-cell efficacy comparisons and add ALI or custom co-culture for tissue penetration, bystander-killing or immune-interaction readouts.

03

Set mechanism-linked endpoints

Select viability, apoptosis, histology, penetration imaging and immune readouts according to the small-molecule, ADC, antibody or immune mechanism.

04

Interpret response in tissue context

Integrate model identity, drug distribution, killing and microenvironment signals to compare candidates and define the next study.

Study scope

Review sample requirements, assays and deliverables

01

Inputs

  • Sample site, pathology and prior treatment
  • Candidate mechanism and target-expression need
  • Need for penetration, bystander or immune interaction
02

Potential readouts

  • CK19, H&E and histologic profiling
  • Viability, apoptosis and dose response
  • Penetration imaging, flow and immune endpoints
03

Study delivery

  • Model and assay QC
  • Raw imaging, quantitative data and methods
  • Candidate comparison, interpretation and recommended follow-up studies

Research applications

Recommended applications

  • Small molecules and combinations
  • Epithelial–stromal research
  • Immunotherapy studies

Assays & QC

Tumor identity, efficacy and immune readouts

Key markers

CK19CD3CD8CD107a

Available assays

  • H&E
  • Alcian Blue
  • IF / IHC
  • Flow cytometry

QC approach

Characterization combines epithelial markers such as CK19 and histology with immune or functional endpoints selected for the study.

Study & delivery

Model characterization, treatment data and reporting

Choose a supplied model or a TRiCBIO-run study. Typical deliverables include histology, functional data and a study report.

Related solutions

Related study options

PROJECT DISCUSSION

Discuss a pancreatic cancer PDO study

Tumor type, sample status, candidate profile and comparison endpoints determine the culture format, controls, assay panel and deliverables for the pancreatic cancer PDO.