TRiCBIO
EvidenceNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOProject inquiry中文
Model & assay dataCase study

Breast cancer PDO: phenotype & tissue identity

Assess ER and Ki67 phenotypes alongside source-tissue/PDO histology to establish model identity and select efficacy endpoints.

01Study objective02Model & design03Assays & findings04Decision & next step
Model & sampleBreast cancer PDO with source-tissue comparison
ObjectiveCompare source-tissue and PDO morphology and establish subtype-associated phenotype before efficacy work
Study conditionsModel identity and baseline characterization
AssaysBright-field, H&E, DAPI, ER and Ki67
Study evidenceTRiCBIO culture and characterization images
DeliverablesReceive images, assay results and an analysis summary; the report documents the study design, sample size and statistical methods

STUDY EVIDENCE

Source tissue, PDO morphology and histology

Source-tissue H&E, PDO bright-field imaging and PDO histology establish morphological correspondence and inform receptor, proliferation and target profiling.

01Source tissue
Source-tissue H&E morphology

Source-tissue H&E morphology

Source-tissue H&E provides the histological reference for subsequent PDO morphology and histology.

Establishes a histologic reference for PDO quality assessment
02Culture morphology
PDO structure in 3D culture

PDO structure in 3D culture

Bright-field imaging documents 3D growth morphology before histology and downstream treatment studies.

Shows culture status before further profiling
03PDO histology
Tissue structure in the PDO section

Tissue structure in the PDO section

PDO H&E is interpreted with the source-tissue reference to assess morphology; molecular concordance is evaluated with markers and omics assays selected for the study.

Informs receptor, proliferation and target assays
View study figure set
Breast-cancer source-tissue and PDO morphology figure set
Breast-cancer source-tissue and PDO morphology figure set

Compare source-tissue H&E, PDO bright-field and PDO histology to view the breast cancer model’s morphological features together.

INTERPRETATION

Source-tissue and PDO morphology with subtype features

How the results are used

Source-tissue and PDO morphological comparisons plus receptor profiling clarify sample context and model subtype phenotype.

Study application

Morphological correspondence, receptor phenotype and culture state support model selection, with long-term stability confirmed through passage and batch QC.

Follow-on study

Use subtype and target context to select the most relevant efficacy, ADC, combination or mechanism study.

Related models and services

Choose the right models and services for the next study

Study planning

Build your study from this evidence

Best suited for

Model characterization, subtype-focused studies or candidate evaluation

What to share

Pathology subtype, sample context, target background and downstream objective

How TRiCBIO runs the study

Culture and tissue comparison, subtype-associated profiling and model selection for the intended study

What you receive

Bright-field and histology images, marker results, QC assessment and recommended study conditions

How it informs the study

Define the subtype- or target-informed study

Key study variables

Receptor status, culture stability, candidate mechanism and inter-sample variation

PROJECT DISCUSSION

Discuss a study built around your program

Tell us which model, assay or finding you want to extend. Our scientists will adapt the approach to your candidate, samples and decision point.