TRiCBIO
EvidenceNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOProject inquiry中文
Study resultsCase study

PDAC PDO 2.0: epithelial identity & immune readouts

Compare source-tissue and PDO histology with CK19/CD3 immunofluorescence and CD3/CD8/CD107a flow to assess epithelial identity and immune readouts.

01Study objective02Model & design03Assays & findings04Decision & next step
Model & samplePancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma PDO 2.0 study model
ObjectiveEstablish tissue identity and microenvironment features for downstream efficacy, immune and mechanism studies
Study conditionsBaseline model assessment and candidate conditions selected for the study
AssaysBright-field, histology, epithelial and program-relevant immune markers
Study evidenceTRiCBIO study data and assay readouts
DeliverablesReceive images, assay results and an analysis summary; the report documents the study design, sample size and statistical methods
01

Establish PDAC epithelial identity and immune readouts

Source-tissue and PDO morphology establish the model context; CK19, CD3 and flow cytometry then provide complementary views of ductal epithelial identity, sample-associated T cells and treatment-related immune change.

02

Profile ductal epithelial identity with CK19

Source-tissue H&E, PDO bright-field and PDO H&E assess tissue correspondence. The green immunofluorescence channel is CK19 and adds ductal epithelial context; red CD3 identifies sample-associated T cells.

  • Source-tissue and PDO H&E
  • PDO bright-field morphology
  • CK19 epithelial profiling
  • CD3 T-cell profiling
03

Relate immune readouts to treatment response

CD3, CD8 and CD107a flow cytometry can characterize T-cell composition and changes in degranulation or activation across treatment conditions, with consistent gating, baseline assessment and replication.

04

Select assay panels by candidate mechanism

Small molecules, ADCs, antibodies and immunotherapies require different endpoints. Once identity is confirmed, studies may add viability, apoptosis, penetration, bystander or immune assays.

  • Model and target context
  • Viability, apoptosis and histology
  • Penetration and bystander endpoints
  • CD3/CD8/CD107a flow
05

Match immune endpoints to candidate mechanism

Model-identity and immune assays work together in one study design. A new program profiles stromal and immune features, then configures gating, controls and replication to compare treatment-related immune change.

INTERPRETATION

Use epithelial and immune readouts to select study endpoints

How the results are used

Use histology, epithelial, stromal and immune profiling to select the most relevant efficacy, immune and mechanism endpoints for the PDAC model.

Study application

Establishment, stromal and immune features are assessed against each PDAC sample baseline and extended with candidate mechanism, controls and independent samples.

Follow-on study

Set dose, time, functional endpoints and controls around the candidate mechanism, then compare across independent samples.

Related models and services

Choose the right models and services for the next study

PROJECT DISCUSSION

Discuss a study built around your program

Tell us which model, assay or finding you want to extend. Our scientists will adapt the approach to your candidate, samples and decision point.