TRiCBIO
EvidenceNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOProject inquiry中文
Model & assay dataModel and assay

IBD organoid inflammation & barrier assays

Support inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) study design with mouse intestinal organoid budding, FITC-Dextran permeability and F-actin/ZO-1 junction structure; human IBD studies are tailored to the sample and goal.

01Study objective02Model & design03Assays & findings04Decision & next step
Model & sampleMouse intestinal organoid method under inflammatory-cytokine conditions
ObjectiveAssess inflammatory effects on morphology, barrier and cell state
Study conditionsTNFα-, IL-1β- and IL-6-associated inflammatory conditions
AssaysMorphology, FITC-Dextran, Calcein AM, F-actin and ZO-1
Study evidenceTRiCBIO mouse intestinal organoid method and assay data
DeliverablesReceive images, assay results and an analysis summary; the report documents the study design, sample size and statistical methods
01MorphologyBudding and wall thickness
02BarrierFITC-Dextran · ZO-1
03Cell stateCalcein AM · F-actin
04Study extensionCandidate & mechanism endpoints
HUMAN INTESTINAL ORGANOID CULTURE

Engineered Matrices Enable the Culture of Human Patient-Derived Intestinal Organoids

This peer-reviewed study describes engineered matrices for culturing human patient-derived intestinal organoids and complements the inflammation and barrier assays used in sample-tailored IBD studies.

View on PubMed
01

Assess inflammation, barrier injury and cell state

Mouse intestinal organoid assays evaluate morphology, barrier integrity and cell state side by side after inflammatory-cytokine treatment.

02

Establishing inflammation

TNFα, IL-1β and IL-6 create an inflammatory condition, with treated and control organoids compared side by side. Budding, overall morphology and epithelial wall thickness provide the first layer of evidence.

  • Organoid budding and morphology
  • Epithelial wall thickness
  • Treatment-to-control comparison
03

Testing barrier integrity

FITC-Dextran tracks permeability. F-actin and ZO-1 immunofluorescence help show whether cytoskeletal organization and tight-junction structure remain intact.

  • FITC-Dextran permeability
  • F-actin organization
  • ZO-1 tight junctions
04

Cell state and study extensions

Calcein AM reflects cell viability. Candidate mechanism can guide additional inflammatory, epithelial-repair or secretion-related endpoints.

  • Calcein AM viability
  • Candidate intervention window
  • Study-specific functional endpoints
05

Interpret injury across structure and function

Together, these mouse-organoid results provide a practical set of structural and functional endpoints for candidate studies. Human IBD programs can then be tailored to the sample, candidate and research goal.

INTERPRETATION

From inflammatory barrier changes to candidate testing

How the results are used

Inflammation-associated changes in morphology, permeability and junction structure help select endpoints and controls for subsequent candidate studies.

Study application

Interpret morphology, barrier and cell-state changes within the mouse intestinal organoid method, then configure human IBD study conditions around the available sample.

Follow-on study

Assess whether treatment reduces inflammatory injury and protects or restores barrier function, then adapt the endpoint set to a sample-tailored human IBD program.

Related models and services

Choose the right models and services for the next study

Study planning

Build your study from this evidence

Best suited for

IBD inflammation and barrier studies using an established mouse-organoid method, with human programs tailored to available samples

What to share

Study hypothesis, intended species and sample, inflammatory condition, candidate intervention and priority barrier endpoints

How TRiCBIO runs the study

Run morphology, permeability, viability and junction assays with the mouse method, or design a human IBD study around the available sample

What you receive

Images, functional results, methods and integrated interpretation

How it informs the study

Compare candidate effects on barrier injury and recovery

Key study variables

Species and sample source, inflammatory intensity, timing, controls and added mechanism endpoints

PROJECT DISCUSSION

Discuss a study built around your program

Tell us which model features and readouts matter most. Our scientists will recommend the model, QC plan and study endpoints.